Search found 4 matches
- Thu Jan 01, 2015 8:26 pm
- Forum: APBRmetrics
- Topic: Flaws with RAPM
- Replies: 63
- Views: 64086
Re: Flaws with RAPM
You're right - 4.8 fouls per 36 minutes is pretty high. Maybe that's the only reason.
- Thu Jan 01, 2015 3:47 pm
- Forum: APBRmetrics
- Topic: Flaws with RAPM
- Replies: 63
- Views: 64086
Re: Flaws with RAPM
Nick Collison's RAPM numbers are more interesting to me than Collins. In the 14-year RAPM data set, Collison has a +3.9, which ranks him 37th out of the 1383 players listed. He's in the top 3% - truly elite. Below are his games started, minutes per game with team rank in parentheses, and team's reco...
- Wed Dec 31, 2014 12:56 pm
- Forum: APBRmetrics
- Topic: Flaws with RAPM
- Replies: 63
- Views: 64086
Re: Flaws with RAPM
Good, metrics should be criticized. Understanding where a metric fails is necessary for correcting it. Long-term APM is a fantastic metric, particularly for measuring defensive impact, but we should still examine the outliers and try to understand why guys like Amir Johnson, Nick Collison, and Jason...
- Tue Dec 30, 2014 8:58 pm
- Forum: APBRmetrics
- Topic: Flaws with RAPM
- Replies: 63
- Views: 64086
Re: Flaws with RAPM
I have a hunch that the surprisingly high plus-minus figures for some low-minute guys are caused mostly by selection bias, as in a coach purposely plays his specialists only in situations where he thinks they would do well and sits them otherwise. Example: Jason Collins is considered a great interio...