On the one hand, the stats don't perceive that Iggy helped slow LeBron quite a bit. Here, "slow" means keeping his shooting% well below his norm.
On the other hand, stats that show Iggy shooting very well, doing other things, and not turning it over -- that last one apparently gives him the WS edge over Curry -- fail to recognize that he had lots of open looks, and open lanes, due to his teammates. He's the 4th option out there, if not the 5th.
Statisticians will usually say, let him take those shots: He can't keep hitting .050 above his norm from the arc, nor .090 better from inside it.
To me, the better "what if" is how does the series play out if the Cavs had either Irving or Love. Two superstars has always been the tipping point, it seems.
What if they'd had all 3? A better series it would have been.
Switch LeBron and Iggy, and you have the greatest team of all times, no doubt. But MVP must come from the winning team.
What boggles my mind is that nobody voted for Curry. I read 7 for Ig, 4 for LeBron.
Who are these voters, anyway?
There must have been some collusion. Otherwise, we might have had LeBron 4, Iggy 3, Steph 3, Green 1.
xyz = 7th root of the product of these (not minutes)
Code: Select all
xyz mvp? Min PER e484 eWins WS WS/48 BPM vorp
2.22 LeBron 275 26.3 2.84 1.57 .90 .156 13.7 1.08
1.61 Curry 255 20.2 2.09 1.07 .83 .156 6.5 .54
1.42 Iguodala 223 18.0 1.53 .69 .92 .198 5.8 .43
1.37 Green 222 16.3 1.56 .70 .81 .176 6.3 .46