Top tier RAPM by position and yr
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2015 10:33 pm
http://nyloncalculus.com/2015/01/02/pos ... -scarcity/
Pct above neutral and avg. estimate for those players thru last season. Lots of positive PGs but their avg. rating is drifting down. Shortage of positive SGs but it has been worse. High level of positive SFs but the quality at the top is nothing special and declining. Golden age for positive PFs but quantity and quality are drifting down. Top centers are weaker on avg. than anytime in 24 yrs.
If you did a followup, a count of the plus 2s or betters would be a nice addition. Avg. pay for the positives and the plus 2s would also be useful for last year or the multi-yr trend. Are GMs paying more or less for a point of RAPM? How does it vary by position and conference? How does the pay trend for these top groups compare to salary increases for the rest of players? Almost one third of players are positive on RAPM are positive for first time in period. How much should the negative RAPM really be paid by their production and is the market operating efficiently? Offensive and defensive splits would also be interesting to analyze and track vs pay.
Any chance your database could be archived at nylon calculus?
Pct above neutral and avg. estimate for those players thru last season. Lots of positive PGs but their avg. rating is drifting down. Shortage of positive SGs but it has been worse. High level of positive SFs but the quality at the top is nothing special and declining. Golden age for positive PFs but quantity and quality are drifting down. Top centers are weaker on avg. than anytime in 24 yrs.
If you did a followup, a count of the plus 2s or betters would be a nice addition. Avg. pay for the positives and the plus 2s would also be useful for last year or the multi-yr trend. Are GMs paying more or less for a point of RAPM? How does it vary by position and conference? How does the pay trend for these top groups compare to salary increases for the rest of players? Almost one third of players are positive on RAPM are positive for first time in period. How much should the negative RAPM really be paid by their production and is the market operating efficiently? Offensive and defensive splits would also be interesting to analyze and track vs pay.
Any chance your database could be archived at nylon calculus?