Mike G wrote:The average offensive rating in 1989 was 110, Jordan was at 112...
Actually, league avg that year was 107.8
No it wasn't, it was 110 in the playoffs. What the average was in the regular season is less relevant to me.
But if we entertain that hypothesis, see my other response a little below.
Against the Cavs and the Pistons, average ORtg was 103 and 105 respectively. It's irrelevant what anyone averaged against the Hornets.
105.3 is equivalent to the Timberwolves basically, you're being silly.
The top 3 defenses in 2013: 100, 100, 102. 1988 is garbage next to that.
Everything is relevant, it is called league environment. Your guy was atrocious in those seasons against Detroit. You cited per game numbers, but that is not logical. A raw rating of 106 is simply terrible.
Bulls also knocked off the Knicks en route to the ECF. The #6 seed bumps off the #3 and the #2 before losing to the #1 in 6 games. Led by the very average (if that) Michael Jordan, they gave the Pistons their only 2 losses of this postseason. How does that work?
Where do you get O-Rtg for a series? Against the Pistons, Jordan had ORtg of 105, 104, 143, 110, 127, and 94. Against a DRtg of 105, that's one below-avg game (offensively), 2 average, 1 above-avg, and 2 severely above-avg.
His averages for the series: 114 ORtg, 106 DRtg
For the 1989 playoffs, ORtg of 120, vs the #1, #2, and #5 defensive teams in the East.
I never brought up the first round of the 88 playoffs.
I said against the 88 Pistons, 89 Pistons, 92 Knicks, etc. Yes 120 back then is like 114 now, Kobeish. Even worse than Kobe against the Pistons.
His numbers against the Cavs don't matter, what matters is his 106 offensive rating on 31 USG%. That's atrocious for 1988, it would be the equivalent of him doing about 100 in the 2013 playoffs, a complete chokejob.
And he averaged 112 in 89, go to basketball-reference and click on those games to compute the aggregate.