Title team starter RAPM: little negative

Home for all your discussion of basketball statistical analysis.
Post Reply
Crow
Posts: 10624
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 11:10 pm

Title team starter RAPM: little negative

Post by Crow »

I looked at the rapm for the starters of last ten title winners. Only 2 teams had 2 negative starters and no more than one was -1 and not more than that. That is a pretty high degree of balanced competency. A couple of contenders this season probably will have more red ink from starters and will most likely fall short in part because of that.
colts18
Posts: 313
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 1:52 am

Re: Title team starter RAPM: little negative

Post by colts18 »

It's because those starters steal credit from the stars. If Mario Chalmers is on an average team, his RAPM is probably below average
Crow
Posts: 10624
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 11:10 pm

Re: Title team starter RAPM: little negative

Post by Crow »

They may steal credit from the starters because of colinearity issues but further investigation would be appropriate to assess. Perhaps worth looking at ASPM for alternative performance measurement.
xkonk
Posts: 307
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 12:37 am

Re: Title team starter RAPM: little negative

Post by xkonk »

colts18 wrote:It's because those starters steal credit from the stars. If Mario Chalmers is on an average team, his RAPM is probably below average
'Steal' or 'play better with'? I'd be willing to believe they are unfairly assessed by RAPM, but I'd also be willing to believe that Filling In the Gaps With Lebron Chalmers is objectively better than Carrying More of The Load Without LeBron Chalmers.
Crow
Posts: 10624
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 11:10 pm

Re: Title team starter RAPM: little negative

Post by Crow »

GSW with one modestly negative starter on RAPM (Barnes), CLE with none.
ampersand5
Posts: 262
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2014 6:18 pm

Re: Title team starter RAPM: little negative

Post by ampersand5 »

check out italia13calcio's spreadsheet of Ginis

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8884&start=30
Post Reply