Article on gambling
Article on gambling
ICYMI, I wrote something about gambling on the NBA.
http://nyloncalculus.com/2015/04/10/fre ... l-betting/
http://nyloncalculus.com/2015/04/10/fre ... l-betting/
-
- Posts: 262
- Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2014 6:18 pm
Re: Article on gambling
I'm confident that a group of APBRers could "beat" vegas.
The biggest impediment is how large of a sample size would be necessary. Considering this, the project would need to be bankrolled by someone with a substantial amount of money. Anyone in that position would have an easier time making money in other ways.
Out of curiosity, how does the Vegas pre-season win predictions compare to those in the 538 contest; namely 538 and PT-PM?
The biggest impediment is how large of a sample size would be necessary. Considering this, the project would need to be bankrolled by someone with a substantial amount of money. Anyone in that position would have an easier time making money in other ways.
Out of curiosity, how does the Vegas pre-season win predictions compare to those in the 538 contest; namely 538 and PT-PM?
Re: Article on gambling
I don't think I've ever been called a "Famous Stathead" before. 

Re: Article on gambling
I really enjoyed this article, Will.
Re: Article on gambling
90%+ of the people here probably won't end up profitable over a long period of time (when it comes to spreads, game totals, etc.)ampersand5 wrote:I'm confident that a group of APBRers could "beat" vegas.
The biggest impediment is how large of a sample size would be necessary. Considering this, the project would need to be bankrolled by someone with a substantial amount of money. Anyone in that position would have an easier time making money in other ways.
Out of curiosity, how does the Vegas pre-season win predictions compare to those in the 538 contest; namely 538 and PT-PM?
if you're talking only about season win totals, then i can see that. but win totals are basically treated as props and don't allow any major action (max 1k per bet @ westgate in lv, dunno about pinnacle, cris, etc.)
syndicates and professional gamblers probably don't want to waste their time on that amount of money and they also might not want to tie up money for 6 months. my guess is that win totals end up easier to beat because of that.
nice article will.
-
- Posts: 262
- Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2014 6:18 pm
Re: Article on gambling
I only mentioned preseason predictions because thats something specific that APBR cares about. The majority of people on APBR don't care about being able to predict who is going to score more points in a quarter, or many of the other narrow areas where professional bettors can make their money.sndesai1 wrote:90%+ of the people here probably won't end up profitable over a long period of time (when it comes to spreads, game totals, etc.)ampersand5 wrote:I'm confident that a group of APBRers could "beat" vegas.
The biggest impediment is how large of a sample size would be necessary. Considering this, the project would need to be bankrolled by someone with a substantial amount of money. Anyone in that position would have an easier time making money in other ways.
Out of curiosity, how does the Vegas pre-season win predictions compare to those in the 538 contest; namely 538 and PT-PM?
if you're talking only about season win totals, then i can see that. but win totals are basically treated as props and don't allow any major action (max 1k per bet @ westgate in lv, dunno about pinnacle, cris, etc.)
syndicates and professional gamblers probably don't want to waste their time on that amount of money and they also might not want to tie up money for 6 months. my guess is that win totals end up easier to beat because of that.
nice article will.
If you think one person working in isolation could beat vegas but not the collective of APBR working together, I think you vastly underestimate the wisdom of crowds.
Re: Article on gambling
You're on my Mount Rushmore of NBA statheads.DSMok1 wrote:I don't think I've ever been called a "Famous Stathead" before.

I suspect that APBR folk have pretty similar methodology and biases and hence wouldn't fit wisdom of crowds requirements.ampersand5 wrote:If you think one person working in isolation could beat vegas but not the collective of APBR working together, I think you vastly underestimate the wisdom of crowds.
Re: Article on gambling
Isn't one of the biggest issues with making a sustainable living from gambling simply having the infrastructure to place big enough bets to make it worth it?
Re: Article on gambling
There's also variance, finding enough betting opportunities with an edge, and discipline.EvanZ wrote:Isn't one of the biggest issues with making a sustainable living from gambling simply having the infrastructure to place big enough bets to make it worth it?
As for the wisdom of crowds, I'm pretty sure I'd get bored too easily to wager profitably.
Re: Article on gambling
You can bet $10k a game on game spreads, on game day at a couple of major books pretty easily. If the spread moves, you can hit it again for $10k.EvanZ wrote:Isn't one of the biggest issues with making a sustainable living from gambling simply having the infrastructure to place big enough bets to make it worth it?
If that's not big enough for you, email me and we'll talk.