Definitely on Ferrell. If he maintains this sort of production, next year will be really valuable from a production to $$$ standpoint. The value will go away after that.Crow wrote:Using space isn't an issue to me. Immediately fully visible is easy.
Curry having Parsons as a comp isn't "bad" but I consider Parsons as something of an empty calorie scorer. Not really empty, just less diverse a contributor than you might expect / want.
Cuban might have gotten too excited in print for Ferrell. At that salary it is fine but still more likely a minor addition than anything that special.
On weights, I'd weight shooting / scoring efficiency higher than other stuff, especially for perimeters.
I'll post my Excel file later tonight once I get home from the office, so people can play around with it. It's a little ugly, as I never expected to send it out, but it's pretty self-explanatory. In theory, this can be the basis for projections moving forward. I haven't had a chance to mess with it much since I created the file a few weeks ago, but my wife is heading out of town starting tomorrow, so I'm going to have a bunch of a free time in the next couple days to make updates/changes.
*I'd be happy to add DRPM, or anything else, I just don't have it. I would need that, or the % at rim, back to 1985.
