There are different ways to look at teams: W-L, SRS, record against top 10, cumulative RPM, etc.
In this thread I am going to check the "four factors" data, fwiw.
Bucks, top 2 on four factors, below average on four. That is kind of a weird mix.
Warriors, #1 at own efg%, one other top ten ranking, then everything else is meh to bad.
Celtics, four top 6 rankings, then meh to bad on rest.
Raptors, 7 above average but none better than 7th best.
Thunder, 3 top 6, 5 meh.
Nuggets, 4 top tens, 3 meh, 1 bad.
Sixers, 5 top 10s, 3 bottom tens.
Jazz, 6 top half, 2 bottom half.
Rockets, 3 top tens, 2 meh, 3 bad.
Of course, they are not equally important and actual performance may look better or worse than the ranking.
Bucks with the most super elite factors. Warriors with least top tens I think and especially dependent on one particular strength. Sixers and Rockets with the most bottom ten flaws. Overall, a fairly diverse set of strengths & weaknesses. At least 4 contenders with 4 top tens show diverse strength. The Raptors and Jazz with the fewest weaknesses but maybe not enough really strong factors.
Might be interesting to track which strengths and weaknesses continue in playoffs and which change significantly. By team and overall trends (this time and previously).