Here's a post from Nov. 17 last year:
https://www.apbr.org/metrics/viewtopic. ... t&start=71
As of Nov. 16, teams had played 11 to 14 games. The Cavs were 14-0, and b-r.com was projecting them to win 60 games.
Our APBR-submitted average, known as avgA, was 48 for Cle; they ended up winning 64; so the b-r.com projection would end up being better by 12.
https://www.basketball-reference.com/fr ... &lg_id=NBA
A retro-contest between
pre-season avgA and
Nov.16 b-r.com produces a clear winner. We can multiply one contestant's guesses by X and the other's by (1-X), and sum them, to get a lowest error at season's end. It turned out like this:
Code: Select all
avgA b-r MAEr
1.0 0.0 7.82
0.8 0.2 7.34
0.6 0.4 7.13
0.4 0.6 6.92
0.2 0.8 6.71
0.0 1.0 6.52
-.2 1.2 6.47
The lowest error is achieved at 1.22 to -.22
At less than 15 games, there was no overall value in the pre-season prediction. That 7.82 was in fact avgA final MAE, which finished 3rd among 17 entries. Vegas surged from 12 to #8 at 8.40 on last-day tanking.
Here are the teams arranged by avgA- minus b-r.com errors at season's end:
Code: Select all
A-b tm avgA b-r W A-b tm W avgA br
20.3 Phl 49 29 24 -12.7 Brk 26 27 40
17.1 NOP 45 28 21 -8.5 Mil 48 46 37
12.0 Cle 48 60 64 -7.4 Ind 50 44 37
9.9 Hou 42 52 52 -7.0 GSW 48 46 57
8.4 Det 30 38 44 -6.6 Min 49 51 41
5.6 Phx 47 41 36 -5.6 SAS 34 34 40
5.4 Por 26 31 36 -5.5 Cha 19 30 35
5.4 Sac 47 42 40 -4.8 Den 50 49 44
5.3 Dal 50 45 39 -4.3 Orl 41 43 47
5.1 Chi 31 36 39 -4.2 Was 18 23 27
4.8 LAC 37 42 50 -4.1 Atl 40 39 35
4.6 Mem 43 48 48 -3.2 Bos 61 58 55
4.1 OKC 56 60 68 -1.7 Tor 30 30 28
2.9 Uta 30 27 17 -1.2 NYK 51 47 46
2.6 Mia 43 40 37
2.5 LAL 41 43 50
116.0 total -76.8 total
On the left, b-r.com at 13 games would end up closer; on the right, pre-season apbr.
b-r.com does better by 1.3 per team