NBA-ABA careers ranked, 1952-2016
Re: NBA-ABA careers ranked, 1952-2016
I suspect maybe your simulation has Eaton generating a lot of wins for the simple reason that you assign a lot of defensive credit to him. Maybe your assessment is exactly right,
eaton has 6 seasons of 300+ blocks, no other player has more than 3 seasons. he also averaged playing just 32 min/g over those 6 seasons. the other 9 players with 18 seasons total of 300+ blocks averaged playing 35 min/g...
in his career he averaged 365 blocks per 3000 minutes, and during his career teams averaged grabbing 67% of rebounds as defensive (utah also 67%)...
so in his career the jazz averaged about 245 defensive stops (365 x 0.67) per 3000 minutes due just to his shot blocking. that does not include all the defensive stops due to eaton preventing shots from going in while not actually blocking the shot, which if you trust the estimates of harvey pollack amounts to another 50%-100% of the shots he actually blocked, or some additional 180-360 forced missed FGAs and 120-240 defensive stops, for a total of about 245+120 to 245+240 or some 365 to 485 defensive stops per 3000 minutes played due to just 1 player...
even if you assume a lower defensive rebounding rate for blocked shots, as low as 60% or even 55% (as opposed to 67%), that's still a slew of defensive stops due to just 1 player...
and his team's stats clearly show the value of his defense - not only was utah the best defensive team in the league over the 8 years of 8485-9192, they were 1st in the league 3 straight years from 8687-8889...
but nobody could know.
eaton was DPOY twice, in 8485 and 8889...
he was named to the all-D team 5 straight years, 8485-8889, 3 times all-D 1st team...
so on the contrary - everyone knows...
somehow not that elite in D-Rating
a rating that gives equal defensive credit to players on the same team normalized to their minutes played outside of their steals, blocks, and defensive rebounds, and you're surprised eaton doesn't rate high in that?...
you think outside of their steals, blocks, and def rebs that on a per minute basis players like darrell griffith, adrian dantley, jeff wilkins, mark iavaroni, jeff malone, et al were equal in defensive ability to mark eaton?...
good luck with that...
eaton has 6 seasons of 300+ blocks, no other player has more than 3 seasons. he also averaged playing just 32 min/g over those 6 seasons. the other 9 players with 18 seasons total of 300+ blocks averaged playing 35 min/g...
in his career he averaged 365 blocks per 3000 minutes, and during his career teams averaged grabbing 67% of rebounds as defensive (utah also 67%)...
so in his career the jazz averaged about 245 defensive stops (365 x 0.67) per 3000 minutes due just to his shot blocking. that does not include all the defensive stops due to eaton preventing shots from going in while not actually blocking the shot, which if you trust the estimates of harvey pollack amounts to another 50%-100% of the shots he actually blocked, or some additional 180-360 forced missed FGAs and 120-240 defensive stops, for a total of about 245+120 to 245+240 or some 365 to 485 defensive stops per 3000 minutes played due to just 1 player...
even if you assume a lower defensive rebounding rate for blocked shots, as low as 60% or even 55% (as opposed to 67%), that's still a slew of defensive stops due to just 1 player...
and his team's stats clearly show the value of his defense - not only was utah the best defensive team in the league over the 8 years of 8485-9192, they were 1st in the league 3 straight years from 8687-8889...
but nobody could know.
eaton was DPOY twice, in 8485 and 8889...
he was named to the all-D team 5 straight years, 8485-8889, 3 times all-D 1st team...
so on the contrary - everyone knows...
somehow not that elite in D-Rating
a rating that gives equal defensive credit to players on the same team normalized to their minutes played outside of their steals, blocks, and defensive rebounds, and you're surprised eaton doesn't rate high in that?...
you think outside of their steals, blocks, and def rebs that on a per minute basis players like darrell griffith, adrian dantley, jeff wilkins, mark iavaroni, jeff malone, et al were equal in defensive ability to mark eaton?...
good luck with that...
Re: NBA-ABA careers ranked, 1952-2016
... an argument can easily be made for eaton being one of the greatest defensive players in league history, if not the greatest.
Going out on a limb here -- it's more likely somewhere in between?outside of their steals, blocks, and def rebs that on a per minute basis players like darrell griffith, adrian dantley, jeff wilkins, mark iavaroni, jeff malone, et al were equal in defensive ability to mark eaton?.
Ranked by minutes, Eaton's teammates were primarily: Malone, Stockton, T Bailey, Griffith, D Green, Hansen, B Edwards, M Brown, J Malone.
Malone and Stockton made some all-D teams, Thurl was good, etc.
Can you run a bunch of simulated series between the 1989 Jazz and Warriors and tell us how often the GSW beat the Jazz 3-0?
Re: NBA-ABA careers ranked, 1952-2016
Going out on a limb here -- it's more likely somewhere in between?
a very weak limb...
eaton from 8485-8889 was DPOY twice and got far more votes for the DPOY (77) over those 5 seasons than anyone (next best was alvin robertson with 43)...
he was all-D 1st team 3 of those seasons, all-D 2nd team twice, and was the only player named to the all-D team each of those 5 years (alvin robertson was 4 times)...
the jazz were by far the best defensive team in the league those 5 years (102.1 ps/100poss allowed). no one else was even close (next best was 103.5 pts/100poss allowed)...
and those 5 years stockton was named to one all-D team (8889) and malone one (8788), and no jazz player other than eaton received a single DPOY vote during that time...
so in the eyes of the voters for DPOY and the all-D team eaton was clearly the dominant defender in the league during that time...
on top of all that from 8384-9192, a stretch of 9 years where eaton played 2000+ minutes each year, the jazz were the league's best defensive team (103.2 pts/100poss allowed), and allowed the lowest eFG% (46.8%) and the lowest 2pt FG% (46.9%) among all teams. those 9 years he averaged 279 blocks/year and 2288 minutes/season...
any player that is the league's dominant defender over a 5 year stretch should be considered one of the all-time great defenders, and when you look at his team's defensive performance over his career where he played major minutes they were in fact the best on defense for a long time - and thus it can be argued he was the best defender ever...
a very weak limb...
eaton from 8485-8889 was DPOY twice and got far more votes for the DPOY (77) over those 5 seasons than anyone (next best was alvin robertson with 43)...
he was all-D 1st team 3 of those seasons, all-D 2nd team twice, and was the only player named to the all-D team each of those 5 years (alvin robertson was 4 times)...
the jazz were by far the best defensive team in the league those 5 years (102.1 ps/100poss allowed). no one else was even close (next best was 103.5 pts/100poss allowed)...
and those 5 years stockton was named to one all-D team (8889) and malone one (8788), and no jazz player other than eaton received a single DPOY vote during that time...
so in the eyes of the voters for DPOY and the all-D team eaton was clearly the dominant defender in the league during that time...
on top of all that from 8384-9192, a stretch of 9 years where eaton played 2000+ minutes each year, the jazz were the league's best defensive team (103.2 pts/100poss allowed), and allowed the lowest eFG% (46.8%) and the lowest 2pt FG% (46.9%) among all teams. those 9 years he averaged 279 blocks/year and 2288 minutes/season...
any player that is the league's dominant defender over a 5 year stretch should be considered one of the all-time great defenders, and when you look at his team's defensive performance over his career where he played major minutes they were in fact the best on defense for a long time - and thus it can be argued he was the best defender ever...
Re: NBA-ABA careers ranked, 1952-2016
I'm still interested in quantifying this stuff. So ...
But elite defensive centers can be expected to influence inside players more than perimeter players, so lets take a more comprehensive look at such opponents.
Here again is Olajuwon's statistical history vs Eaton, from 1985-1993; he played 1725 minutes (46 G) vs Utah in that time.Hakeem took 40 more FGA and 38 more FTA vs Eaton/Jazz than he did in his avg rates during the interval. But he shot .036 worse, netting 11 fewer points than normal.
These net (surplus/deficit) totals can be summed and averaged over any sample of players. These guys played from 1985 on and are called C, C-F, or F-C:Utah's pace is right around league avg for the interval.
Ranked by net TS%, from those who were unfazed by Mtn Man at the top, to those he completely owned at the bottom.
Note both Hot Rod and Daugherty from the Cavs could not solve Eaton and the Jazz. Oakley could not, but Ewing was fine. The Hawks' Willis and Carr were unimpressed.
On avg, these guys not only made fewer shots vs Utah, they also attempted fewer, incl. FT. More OReb, but only what you might get from more missed FGA. Only a tiny bump in their blocks.
This eFG% trend is about 50% better than the overall Jazz advantage (-.022) over the league at the time. It may be that it's the entirety of the advantage, if perimeter shooters were less affected by the Utah interior D.
Obviously some blocks will be on the opposing C, but not all. The (known) blocks affect the whole opposing team, while the -.050 assigned to his man defense would only be -.010 vs the whole team (if the C takes 1/5 of shots), multiplied by mpg/48....if Eaton blocks 8% of all opponent shots -- and lets just say they would otherwise be .500 eFG% shots -- that alone is reducing oppFG% by .040
Then if you say he's also reducing his man's FG% by another .050, does that mean opposing centers may have shot .060-.090 worse against him?
But elite defensive centers can be expected to influence inside players more than perimeter players, so lets take a more comprehensive look at such opponents.
Here again is Olajuwon's statistical history vs Eaton, from 1985-1993; he played 1725 minutes (46 G) vs Utah in that time.
Code: Select all
per36 FG FGA FTA ORb DRb Blk Pts eFG% TS%
all 8.9 17.3 6.7 4.0 8.2 3.5 22.6 .515 .558
vs E 8.7 18.1 7.5 4.6 7.8 3.8 22.4 .481 .522
net -8 40 38 29 -20 16 -11 -.033 -.036
These net (surplus/deficit) totals can be summed and averaged over any sample of players. These guys played from 1985 on and are called C, C-F, or F-C:
Code: Select all
vs Eaton min FG FGA FTA ORb DRb Blk Pts eFG% TS%
Willis 400 10 3 10 -5 1 1 27 .054 .053
Ch Smith 454 7 1 -5 -11 1 -2 12 .035 .031
Carr 656 -5 -18 9 -9 6 -1 0 .017 .030
Tisdale 518 3 1 3 -4 -7 3 12 .012 .019
Rasmussen 726 19 31 10 5 -13 0 48 .012 .019
Duckworth 799 4 4 26 -2 -7 3 28 .007 .016
Cage 1252 -4 -13 3 -3 -24 -8 -7 .009 .008
Ewing 554 3 5 -14 7 12 8 -6 -.001 -.007
Thorpe 1499 -49 -74 -31 24 -41 -1 -123 -.022 -.019
Olajuwon 1725 -8 40 38 29 -20 16 -11 -.033 -.036
vs Eaton min FG FGA FTA ORb DRb Blk Pts eFG% TS%
Schrempf 658 -13 -9 -27 -16 -2 1 -44 -.031 -.037
Gilliam 541 -15 -4 -23 6 -2 -4 -33 -.061 -.038
Benjamin 894 -23 -22 -20 0 9 24 -61 -.043 -.043
Perkins 1399 -49 -33 27 17 5 -1 -69 -.077 -.043
HRWilliams 359 -13 -9 -1 10 -2 0 -24 -.079 -.053
Green 1040 -26 -29 -70 -9 -7 -7 -111 -.046 -.074
Ho Grant 444 -23 -26 -10 4 1 3 -54 -.094 -.083
McKey 620 -17 3 -1 38 52 0 -41 -.087 -.090
Oakley 420 -13 -1 -13 -7 1 1 -35 -.110 -.111
Daugherty 458 -23 -1 -14 9 -28 -2 -63 -.138 -.139
vs Eaton min FG FGA FTA ORb DRb Blk Pts eFG% TS%
totals 15416 -236 -151 -104 83 -67 34 -552 -.034 -.030
per36 -.55 -.35 -.24 .19 -.16 .08 -1.29 -.032 -.028
Ranked by net TS%, from those who were unfazed by Mtn Man at the top, to those he completely owned at the bottom.
Note both Hot Rod and Daugherty from the Cavs could not solve Eaton and the Jazz. Oakley could not, but Ewing was fine. The Hawks' Willis and Carr were unimpressed.
On avg, these guys not only made fewer shots vs Utah, they also attempted fewer, incl. FT. More OReb, but only what you might get from more missed FGA. Only a tiny bump in their blocks.
This eFG% trend is about 50% better than the overall Jazz advantage (-.022) over the league at the time. It may be that it's the entirety of the advantage, if perimeter shooters were less affected by the Utah interior D.
Re: NBA-ABA careers ranked, 1952-2016
The (known) blocks affect the whole opposing team, while the -.050 assigned to his man defense would only be -.010 vs the whole team (if the C takes 1/5 of shots), multiplied by mpg/48.
lots of defensive switches in there too...
Here again is Olajuwon's statistical history vs Eaton, from 1985-1993;
for the flip side of the coin you might want to look at how olajuwon did against a poor shot blocking, not great defensive C, during that 9 year stretch. maybe a kevin duckworth, bill cartwright, or frank brickowski type player...
On avg, these guys not only made fewer shots vs Utah, they also attempted fewer
yes, this is important too...
This eFG% trend is about 50% better than the overall Jazz advantage (-.022) over the league at the time.
the 3 year stretch the jazz lead the league in team defense each year (8687-8889) they allowed just a 45.7% 2pt FG% (45.8% eFG%) when the league average 2pt FG% was 49.0% (48.9% eFG%)...
that's a -3.3% difference from the league average 2pt FG% over 246 games. the next best team was only -2.0% (detroit)...
eaton played 2000+ minutes/season from 8384-9192. those years the jazz allowed a 46.9% 2pt FG% (46.85 eFG%), when the league average was 49.2% (49.0% eFG%), a difference in 2pt FG% allowed of -2.3% (-2.2% in eFG%)...
the next best team - boston - was -1.4% in 2pt FG% (-1.4% in eFG%)...
in both instances (3 year and 9 year stretches) the difference in 2pt FG% allowed between utah and the 2nd best team was the same or close to the same as the difference between the 2nd best team and the 8th/9th best team in lowest 2pt FG% allowed...
that's about as dominant of team shot defense as you'll ever see over such long periods of time (which the league has tracked since the 70-71 season)...
lots of defensive switches in there too...
Here again is Olajuwon's statistical history vs Eaton, from 1985-1993;
for the flip side of the coin you might want to look at how olajuwon did against a poor shot blocking, not great defensive C, during that 9 year stretch. maybe a kevin duckworth, bill cartwright, or frank brickowski type player...
On avg, these guys not only made fewer shots vs Utah, they also attempted fewer
yes, this is important too...
This eFG% trend is about 50% better than the overall Jazz advantage (-.022) over the league at the time.
the 3 year stretch the jazz lead the league in team defense each year (8687-8889) they allowed just a 45.7% 2pt FG% (45.8% eFG%) when the league average 2pt FG% was 49.0% (48.9% eFG%)...
that's a -3.3% difference from the league average 2pt FG% over 246 games. the next best team was only -2.0% (detroit)...
eaton played 2000+ minutes/season from 8384-9192. those years the jazz allowed a 46.9% 2pt FG% (46.85 eFG%), when the league average was 49.2% (49.0% eFG%), a difference in 2pt FG% allowed of -2.3% (-2.2% in eFG%)...
the next best team - boston - was -1.4% in 2pt FG% (-1.4% in eFG%)...
in both instances (3 year and 9 year stretches) the difference in 2pt FG% allowed between utah and the 2nd best team was the same or close to the same as the difference between the 2nd best team and the 8th/9th best team in lowest 2pt FG% allowed...
that's about as dominant of team shot defense as you'll ever see over such long periods of time (which the league has tracked since the 70-71 season)...
Re: NBA-ABA careers ranked, 1952-2016
Of 744 careers I have ranked, just 10 players have less than half the avg Scoring rate, once standardized.
The 'standards' are per 36 minutes and per 100 team and opponent points per game.
This gives an average NBA/ABA scorer a Sco rate of 15.0
In chronological order, these non-scorers with significant careers:That's George and Ervin (not Magic) Johnson.
George is most similar to Eaton -- a bit higher rate of everything but blocks, which are close.
He ranks just above Eaton due to playoff careers, which we may evaluate later.
Eaton was arguably the best defensive player AND the worst offensive player (to be given many minutes) during his prime years. Does that make him roughly average? Does defense help a team more than offense does?
Check out the top 100 players in total minutes from 1985 thru 1989:
http://bkref.com/tiny/ypdN6
Most played all 5 years at > 1700 min/yr. Two are in the interval for just 3 of the seasons at close to 3000 min/yr (Daugherty, Person).
So among these 100 most regular players, Eaton ranks at the top in these:
He's 2nd to Hakeem in Defensive Win Shares; well ahead of Laimbeer, Malone, Cummings.
He's also 17th in DReb% and TReb%, 30th in OReb%
Then he crushes the competition at the bottom of the offensive lineup:That's Herb Williams (Ind) getting swamped here.
Eaton's 3rd (from the bottom) in Steal% and Ast%, 4th in TO% and PER. He played a lot more minutes than those with lower PER (Dunn, Cureton, Mahorn).
Oh yeah: He beats out Darrell Walker for worst eFG%, .439 to .438 (Next worst: John Bagley .453)
The 'standards' are per 36 minutes and per 100 team and opponent points per game.
This gives an average NBA/ABA scorer a Sco rate of 15.0
In chronological order, these non-scorers with significant careers:
Code: Select all
player years G mpg Eff% Sco Reb Ast PF Stl TO Blk T rk
Govan 68-76 747 33 .438 6.2 8.8 3.3 3.3 .8 2.3 .6 17.3 666
GJohnson 73-86 961 20 .487 7.0 9.9 1.6 4.9 .9 2.5 3.8 21.1 556
Dunn 78-91 1056 23 .494 6.1 6.2 2.0 3.1 1.9 1.2 .4 15.8 738
Eaton 83-93 949 29 .494 6.7 9.6 1.1 4.1 .5 1.8 4.2 21.1 568
Cage 85-00 1193 14 .538 7.3 10.2 1.0 3.0 1.2 .9 .9 20.0 693
McMillan 87-98 894 25 .498 7.4 5.7 7.6 4.0 2.5 2.5 .6 23.2 381
C Dudley 88-02 929 18 .423 6.1 11.0 .7 4.6 .7 1.4 2.0 18.7 743
EJohnson 94-06 920 20 .526 6.8 10.5 .8 4.6 .9 1.3 2.1 19.6 713
BWallace 97-12 1216 30 .468 7.2 12.7 1.7 2.4 1.6 1.2 2.4 25.7 142
R Evans 02-15 854 19 .488 7.0 13.8 .9 4.2 1.2 2.0 .3 20.4 696
George is most similar to Eaton -- a bit higher rate of everything but blocks, which are close.
He ranks just above Eaton due to playoff careers, which we may evaluate later.
Eaton was arguably the best defensive player AND the worst offensive player (to be given many minutes) during his prime years. Does that make him roughly average? Does defense help a team more than offense does?
Check out the top 100 players in total minutes from 1985 thru 1989:
http://bkref.com/tiny/ypdN6
Most played all 5 years at > 1700 min/yr. Two are in the interval for just 3 of the seasons at close to 3000 min/yr (Daugherty, Person).
So among these 100 most regular players, Eaton ranks at the top in these:
Code: Select all
block% DRtg DBPM
7.4 Eaton 99 Eaton 5.8 Eaton
5.2 Benjamin 99 Olajuwon 3.1 Olajuwon
4.9 Ewing 101 Malone 2.5 Lister
4.9 Olajuwon 102 Stockton 2.5 Ewing, Dunn
4.9 Lister 103 5 guys 2.5 Benjamin
He's also 17th in DReb% and TReb%, 30th in OReb%
Then he crushes the competition at the bottom of the offensive lineup:
Code: Select all
Off. BPM Off. WS Off. Rtg
-4.0 Eaton -4.7 Eaton 95 Eaton
-2.8 Benjamin .1 HWilliams 99 HWilliams
-2.5 Mahorn .7 Sampson 100 Benjamin
-2.2 HWilliams 1.2 Benjamin 100 Sampson
-2.1 Cureton 1.5 Cureton 101 4 guys
Eaton's 3rd (from the bottom) in Steal% and Ast%, 4th in TO% and PER. He played a lot more minutes than those with lower PER (Dunn, Cureton, Mahorn).
Oh yeah: He beats out Darrell Walker for worst eFG%, .439 to .438 (Next worst: John Bagley .453)
Re: NBA-ABA careers ranked, 1952-2016
Eaton was arguably the best defensive player
arguably - his defense generated wins at high rates...
AND the worst offensive player (to be given many minutes)
not even close - you're talking about a player that over an 11 year career averaged just 2.1 TO/40min and only 3.9 missed FGA/40min. so he was personally responsible for very few zero point team possessions on offense. how does that make him the worst offensive player?...
eaton and ben wallace were both great defenders...
wallace had a career scoring rate of 5.7 pts/g playing 29 min/g, eaton 6.0 pts/g playing 29 min/g. both were awful in offensive efficiency, eaton at 1.49 pts/0ptposs, wallace at 1.42 pts/0ptposs...
you have ben wallace ranked 142nd on your list, eaton nowhere to be found...
during his prime years. Does that make him roughly average?
not even close...
did he provide alot of offense? surely no. but did he hurt his team offensively? did his offense cost his team alot of wins? absolutely not - he rarely saw the ball on offense (just a career 0.43 touches/min on offense)...
Does defense help a team more than offense does?
it certainly did for utah from 8384-9192, the 9 years eaton played 2000+ minutes/season for the jazz...
during those 9 years they ranked just 15th in the league in offensive efficiency, but had the league's 5th best regular season W-L record. how?...
because over that long 9 year stretch they ranked 1st in the league in defensive efficiency (103.2 pts/100poss allowed), and it wasn't even close. the difference between utah and the 2nd best defensive team detroit (1.3 pts/100poss) was the same as that between detroit and the 9th best defensive team...
i.e. utah was a dominant defensive team for a long time, due primarily to eaton...
arguably - his defense generated wins at high rates...
AND the worst offensive player (to be given many minutes)
not even close - you're talking about a player that over an 11 year career averaged just 2.1 TO/40min and only 3.9 missed FGA/40min. so he was personally responsible for very few zero point team possessions on offense. how does that make him the worst offensive player?...
eaton and ben wallace were both great defenders...
wallace had a career scoring rate of 5.7 pts/g playing 29 min/g, eaton 6.0 pts/g playing 29 min/g. both were awful in offensive efficiency, eaton at 1.49 pts/0ptposs, wallace at 1.42 pts/0ptposs...
you have ben wallace ranked 142nd on your list, eaton nowhere to be found...
during his prime years. Does that make him roughly average?
not even close...
did he provide alot of offense? surely no. but did he hurt his team offensively? did his offense cost his team alot of wins? absolutely not - he rarely saw the ball on offense (just a career 0.43 touches/min on offense)...
Does defense help a team more than offense does?
it certainly did for utah from 8384-9192, the 9 years eaton played 2000+ minutes/season for the jazz...
during those 9 years they ranked just 15th in the league in offensive efficiency, but had the league's 5th best regular season W-L record. how?...
because over that long 9 year stretch they ranked 1st in the league in defensive efficiency (103.2 pts/100poss allowed), and it wasn't even close. the difference between utah and the 2nd best defensive team detroit (1.3 pts/100poss) was the same as that between detroit and the 9th best defensive team...
i.e. utah was a dominant defensive team for a long time, due primarily to eaton...
Re: NBA-ABA careers ranked, 1952-2016
Bob,
Nobody in the world will argue with the fact that Utah was the best defensive team when Eaton played. This is easily quantifiable.
You say this was "... due primarily to eaton..." How do we know this?
Karl Malone would go on to 3 all-Defensive 1st teams, same as Eaton.
Stockton would make all-D just about every-other season, for a total of 5 times -- same as Eaton.
Eaton had the gaudy block totals, and somebody from the Jazz had to be recognized. In fact, Win Shares (defensive) in the 9 years concurs:It should be noted that Stockton played 8 years in the interval, Malone the last 7.
Per-season DWS, it's Eaton 4.84, Stockton 4.78, Malone 4.66
Drop Stockton's rookie season (as we did Eaton's), and he has 5.13 DWS/yr.
We know that Def. Win Shares is a team award, adjusted for steals, blocks and D-Reb. So each of these big 3 is benefiting from one of those stats, apart from the team.
Stockton in his career had just .947 as many steals on the road as he got at home. If the difference is in scorekeeper generosity at home, we may conclude that his steal total is .974 legitimate.
Eaton's home Blocks were apparently inflated by some 29%. With an away/home ratio of .774, we can guesstimate that about .88 of his total 'blocks' were real.
Replace Eaton with a better offensive center, and the team ranks higher in O and lower in D. With Ostertag and whomever, they had 4 years with better point differential than any they had with Eaton.
Nobody in the world will argue with the fact that Utah was the best defensive team when Eaton played. This is easily quantifiable.
You say this was "... due primarily to eaton..." How do we know this?
Karl Malone would go on to 3 all-Defensive 1st teams, same as Eaton.
Stockton would make all-D just about every-other season, for a total of 5 times -- same as Eaton.
Eaton had the gaudy block totals, and somebody from the Jazz had to be recognized. In fact, Win Shares (defensive) in the 9 years concurs:
Code: Select all
WS 84-92 Off Def
87.3 Malone 54.7 32.6
80.6 Stockton 42.3 38.2
42.1 Eaton -1.6 43.6
38.2 Bailey 11.6 26.6
35.3 Dantley 29.0 6.3
27.2 Green 14.8 12.4
Per-season DWS, it's Eaton 4.84, Stockton 4.78, Malone 4.66
Drop Stockton's rookie season (as we did Eaton's), and he has 5.13 DWS/yr.
We know that Def. Win Shares is a team award, adjusted for steals, blocks and D-Reb. So each of these big 3 is benefiting from one of those stats, apart from the team.
Stockton in his career had just .947 as many steals on the road as he got at home. If the difference is in scorekeeper generosity at home, we may conclude that his steal total is .974 legitimate.
Eaton's home Blocks were apparently inflated by some 29%. With an away/home ratio of .774, we can guesstimate that about .88 of his total 'blocks' were real.
We would expect the worst offensive players to get very few shots. If he only takes a few shots a game, he's not really expected to make difficult shots. Yet he has the worst eFG%/ TS% in the league some years, among players with as many shots or minutes.you're talking about a player that over an 11 year career averaged just 2.1 TO/40min and only 3.9 missed FGA/40min. so he was personally responsible for very few zero point team possessions on offense. how does that make him the worst offensive player?..
Replace Eaton with a better offensive center, and the team ranks higher in O and lower in D. With Ostertag and whomever, they had 4 years with better point differential than any they had with Eaton.
Re: NBA-ABA careers ranked, 1952-2016
Here's Jazz and opponent home and road eFG%, broken into 3 eras: the Eaton era, the rest of the Malone/Stockton era, and post-Malone/Stockton:The Eaton era has the biggest home/away differential (.026) for opponents' shooting and the smallest (.018) for the Jazz'.
For what it's worth.
Also, SLC is at 4200' elevation.
Code: Select all
eFG% - Jazz Opponents
years home away @Uta @Opp
84-92 .505 .487 .455 .481
93-03 .512 .491 .469 .486
04-16 .504 .482 .488 .505
For what it's worth.
Also, SLC is at 4200' elevation.
Re: NBA-ABA careers ranked, 1952-2016
Nobody in the world will argue with the fact that Utah was the best defensive team when Eaton played. This is easily quantifiable.
yes...
You say this was "... due primarily to eaton..." How do we know this?
see above...
Eaton's home Blocks were apparently inflated by some 29%.
if a player does not block a shot but alters it such that it does not go in, from a team perspective what's the difference?...
We would expect the worst offensive players to get very few shots.
in 14-15 kobe bryant averaged 33.1 ScOpp/48min (FGA + FTA/2), the 8th highest rate of estimated scoring opportunities over the past decade...
he shot 40% on 2s, 29% on 3s, and averaged 5.1 TO/48min...
and was personally responsible for about 15-16 0ptposs/40min...
i challenge you to find a worst season offensively - i'm sure there are some but not many will lower a team's rate of pts scored per team possession more...
none of eaton's seasons come even close to lowering a team's offpts/poss as much as that kobe season...
Eaton was arguably the best defensive player AND the worst offensive player (to be given many minutes) during his prime years.
not a single one of the seasons where eaton played 2000+ minutes, on a 40 min/g and 82 game basis, lowers a team's offensive pts/poss by as much as say the 3 "prime" seasons of a C like michael olowokandi (9900-0102)...
you want to start awarding WOPYAs (worst offensive player of the year award), you can start with a C like the kandi man...
yes...
You say this was "... due primarily to eaton..." How do we know this?
see above...
Eaton's home Blocks were apparently inflated by some 29%.
if a player does not block a shot but alters it such that it does not go in, from a team perspective what's the difference?...
We would expect the worst offensive players to get very few shots.
in 14-15 kobe bryant averaged 33.1 ScOpp/48min (FGA + FTA/2), the 8th highest rate of estimated scoring opportunities over the past decade...
he shot 40% on 2s, 29% on 3s, and averaged 5.1 TO/48min...
and was personally responsible for about 15-16 0ptposs/40min...
i challenge you to find a worst season offensively - i'm sure there are some but not many will lower a team's rate of pts scored per team possession more...
none of eaton's seasons come even close to lowering a team's offpts/poss as much as that kobe season...
Eaton was arguably the best defensive player AND the worst offensive player (to be given many minutes) during his prime years.
not a single one of the seasons where eaton played 2000+ minutes, on a 40 min/g and 82 game basis, lowers a team's offensive pts/poss by as much as say the 3 "prime" seasons of a C like michael olowokandi (9900-0102)...
you want to start awarding WOPYAs (worst offensive player of the year award), you can start with a C like the kandi man...
Re: NBA-ABA careers ranked, 1952-2016
One could do an experiment: A team decides to use only 4 players on offense, their 5th guy remaining at the defensive end. When they have the ball, they go 4 against 5.
Their 5th player, of course, never misses a shot and rarely turns it over. Does this help their offense, to have such an error-free player?
The Warriors actually did something like this with Manute Bol. He'd occasionally stroll across midcourt and launch a three; but his value was diminished by going any further; they wanted him to always be back on defense.
Mark Eaton could not take 33 attempts in 48 minutes and make 48% of them. He couldn't make 48% on half that many. He never had a season shooting that well on 1/3 as many!
He got as high as 13 TSA per 100 poss. -- same year he bottomed out at .400 FG%
His best TS% and FG% were when he was taking <6 FGA/100 poss.
In NBA history, nobody has played as many minutes while shooting less often AND with lower TS%
http://bkref.com/tiny/GjEox
Their 5th player, of course, never misses a shot and rarely turns it over. Does this help their offense, to have such an error-free player?
The Warriors actually did something like this with Manute Bol. He'd occasionally stroll across midcourt and launch a three; but his value was diminished by going any further; they wanted him to always be back on defense.
Mark Eaton could not take 33 attempts in 48 minutes and make 48% of them. He couldn't make 48% on half that many. He never had a season shooting that well on 1/3 as many!
He got as high as 13 TSA per 100 poss. -- same year he bottomed out at .400 FG%
His best TS% and FG% were when he was taking <6 FGA/100 poss.
In NBA history, nobody has played as many minutes while shooting less often AND with lower TS%
http://bkref.com/tiny/GjEox
Re: NBA-ABA careers ranked, 1952-2016
Kobe played just 35 games that year -- the first 27 ... 8 of the next 16 ... and none after that.in 14-15 kobe bryant averaged 33.1 ScOpp/48min (FGA + FTA/2), the 8th highest rate of estimated scoring opportunities over the past decade...
he shot 40% on 2s, 29% on 3s, and averaged 5.1 TO/48min...
and was personally responsible for about 15-16 0ptposs/40min...
i challenge you to find a worst season offensively - i'm sure there are some but not many will lower a team's rate of pts scored per team possession more...
Here's how the Lakers shot and scored in these intervals:
Code: Select all
Gms KB FG% PPG
1-27 27 .435 102.1
28-43 8 .438 96.1
44-82 0 .434 96.8
http://www.basketball-reference.com/tea ... 5/gamelog/
Since Kobe did not hurt the Lakers' overall FG% when he played -- and he seems to have aided them by over 5 PPG on offense -- at least half of all NBA player-seasons qualify for "worse season offensively"?
They went 10-25 in Kobe games, 21-61 overall; thus 11-36 without him. Some 2-3 wins/82 better before he was shelved.
EDIT: More numbers for the beginning and end of the Lakers season, when Kobe was/wasn't playing:
Code: Select all
'15 LAL W% ORtg FTr TS% Stl% eFG% TO%
1st 27 G .296 106.7 .302 .518 7.7 .473 10.7
last 38 .237 103.3 .257 .507 7.1 .470 11.8
Re: NBA-ABA careers ranked, 1952-2016
Player careers ranked 401 to 500That's "Fast" Eddie Johnson, 1978-87
Code: Select all
401-410 G Min Sco Reb Ast Stl TO Blk T po% p/r
Cedric Ceballos 662 24 20.0 7.8 1.6 1.1 2.3 .4 28.2 .07 .85
Kenny Smith 799 30 15.0 2.4 6.2 1.2 2.6 .1 23.3 .08 .98
Lonnie Shelton 725 28 14.0 7.6 2.5 1.4 2.7 1.0 23.4 .08 .99
Klay Thompson 450 33 21.2 3.7 2.6 1.0 2.0 .6 27.2 .16 .93
DeMar DeRozan 552 34 20.2 4.5 2.9 1.0 2.1 .3 26.8 .06 .97
Danny Granger 621 31 20.1 5.8 2.0 1.1 2.2 .9 27.6 .04 .86
Phil Smith 706 29 17.2 3.5 4.5 1.4 2.8 .3 24.2 .06 1.04
Carl Braun 628 30 16.9 3.2 4.6 1.7 2.3 .2 24.9 .04 .99
Mel Hutchins 464 38 12.6 8.4 3.2 1.4 2.1 1.3 25.4 .06 .88
Michael Redd 645 32 22.4 4.6 2.3 1.0 1.8 .1 28.6 .02 .86
411-420 G Min Sco Reb Ast Stl TO Blk T po% p/r
Otis Birdsong 728 31 19.3 3.5 3.5 1.4 2.5 .2 25.4 .05 .95
Freddie Lewis 856 34 13.7 3.0 3.9 1.7 2.8 .1 19.7 .14 1.06
Devin Harris 845 26 16.9 3.3 5.6 1.5 2.6 .3 25.5 .07 .74
Dave Robisch 964 25 13.5 8.2 2.3 .7 1.6 .7 23.7 .04 1.04
Brian Grant 814 28 14.1 9.8 1.6 .7 2.0 .9 24.5 .07 .92
Brent Barry 1000 25 14.4 4.3 4.4 1.4 1.9 .4 23.7 .07 .74
Ralph Simpson 748 28 17.4 4.0 4.0 1.7 3.7 .2 23.3 .08 .99
Rick Fox 1040 25 12.8 5.2 3.8 1.4 2.3 .5 21.4 .10 .88
Steve Mix 867 23 14.6 6.9 2.4 1.7 2.2 .3 23.7 .07 .94
Goran Dragic 604 27 17.5 3.9 5.8 1.3 2.9 .2 26.4 .04 1.01
421-430 G Min Sco Reb Ast Stl TO Blk T po% p/r
Darrell Armstrong 888 24 14.2 4.1 6.1 2.0 2.7 .2 24.8 .06 .77
Mike Dunleavy 959 28 15.3 5.5 2.7 .9 1.8 .4 23.1 .03 1.08
Tyrone Corbin 1130 26 12.0 6.6 2.4 1.5 1.6 .3 21.3 .07 .93
Tim Thomas 876 26 15.8 5.8 2.0 1.0 1.9 .5 22.6 .07 1.11
Samuel Dalembert 911 24 12.0 12.6 .7 .7 2.1 2.6 26.1 .03 .97
Lucius Allen 745 29 15.7 3.4 5.3 1.8 3.3 .4 23.8 .05 .97
Ty Lawson 513 30 16.3 3.4 7.2 1.4 2.6 .1 27.2 .06 .99
Rony Seikaly 692 32 16.2 11.1 1.4 .8 3.2 1.5 26.8 .02 .81
Jrue Holiday 458 32 16.6 4.2 6.2 1.6 3.0 .4 26.9 .05 1.02
Jack Marin 900 29 16.4 5.3 2.5 .8 2.0 .3 22.7 .06 .96
431-440 G Min Sco Reb Ast Stl TO Blk T po% p/r
Junior Bridgeman 898 25 16.9 4.7 3.1 1.1 2.3 .3 23.7 .06 .95
Jim McMillian 703 33 15.0 5.2 2.5 1.3 1.7 .2 22.7 .12 .95
Orlando Woolridge 887 28 18.6 5.4 2.2 .8 2.5 .8 24.7 .04 .85
Rodney Rogers 892 25 14.8 6.3 2.8 1.3 2.6 .7 23.0 .09 .86
Andray Blatche 591 22 16.3 9.3 2.0 1.4 2.6 1.3 27.3 .07 .93
Rickey Green 998 25 11.8 2.6 7.1 2.0 2.3 .1 23.0 .05 1.04
Purvis Short 860 29 18.7 5.2 2.8 1.3 2.5 .3 25.3 .01 .80
Mike Newlin 859 29 17.0 3.5 4.6 1.2 3.1 .1 23.0 .03 1.02
Tom Meschery 817 30 13.1 7.6 1.9 1.0 1.9 1.2 22.5 .05 1.07
Kerry Kittles 561 33 15.9 4.4 2.9 1.8 1.3 .5 25.0 .09 .96
441-450 G Min Sco Reb Ast Stl TO Blk T po% p/r
Greg Monroe 457 31 17.7 11.4 2.5 1.3 2.4 .7 31.1 .00 .93
Grant Long 1045 28 11.7 8.0 2.1 1.5 2.0 .4 21.5 .04 .99
Udonis Haslem 960 25 11.4 10.3 1.2 .7 1.3 .4 22.1 .13 .90
Cla. Weatherspoon 930 30 13.3 9.1 1.8 1.1 1.9 1.0 24.6 .01 .76
George Hill 625 29 15.5 4.1 4.0 1.1 1.6 .3 24.1 .14 .94
Thaddeus Young 701 30 16.5 7.2 1.6 1.6 1.7 .5 25.7 .05 .81
Brian Winters 691 31 17.2 3.0 4.5 1.4 2.8 .3 23.9 .06 1.02
Vern Fleming 927 27 13.5 4.3 5.7 1.3 2.5 .2 23.1 .03 .91
James Silas 722 30 17.4 3.3 4.3 1.2 2.8 .2 23.6 .06 .97
Jim Chones 828 30 13.7 9.1 1.9 .6 2.4 1.3 23.5 .04 .81
451-460 G Min Sco Reb Ast Stl TO Blk T po% p/r
Bryon Russell 937 24 13.0 5.6 1.9 1.5 1.4 .3 20.9 .13 1.07
Herb Williams 1151 25 13.3 7.9 2.2 .7 2.4 2.0 23.7 .02 .66
Kemba Walker 375 34 19.1 4.2 5.2 1.5 2.3 .4 29.3 .03 1.02
Andrew Toney 534 27 20.1 2.8 5.0 1.0 3.9 .3 24.7 .15 .97
Benoit Benjamin 816 27 13.7 9.8 1.6 .8 2.9 2.5 25.4 .02 .87
Charles Smith 630 29 16.8 7.0 1.7 1.0 2.2 1.7 25.7 .09 .84
Larry Costello 754 30 13.4 3.3 5.1 1.9 2.1 .2 22.6 .06 .94
David Greenwood 841 28 11.6 10.0 2.2 .9 2.2 1.1 23.3 .02 .96
Gene Shue 731 34 14.5 3.4 4.0 1.6 2.0 .2 22.4 .05 1.10
Maurice Stokes 203 37 12.6 13.5 5.4 1.9 2.9 2.1 33.9 .01 .64
461-470 G Min Sco Reb Ast Stl TO Blk T po% p/r
Jose Calderon 766 29 13.6 3.4 7.3 1.1 2.1 .1 24.8 .02 1.01
Kevin Martin 736 30 22.0 4.0 2.1 1.1 2.0 .1 27.0 .03 .82
Warren Jabali 483 34 14.2 5.6 5.0 2.1 3.8 .3 23.4 .07 .97
Michael Adams 672 31 14.9 3.3 6.6 1.9 2.5 .1 25.8 .03 .78
Chris Morris 815 24 14.2 6.5 2.1 1.7 2.1 1.0 23.5 .06 .98
Gerald Wilkins 952 29 15.0 3.7 3.6 1.2 2.3 .3 21.7 .06 .99
Darrell Griffith 799 28 18.3 4.1 2.5 1.5 2.7 .4 23.9 .05 .96
Jim Eakins 842 25 12.4 8.1 2.2 .8 2.7 1.3 21.4 .09 .99
Chris Kaman 753 27 15.3 10.7 1.6 .6 2.9 1.7 26.3 .02 .83
Nicolas Batum 590 31 14.5 6.3 3.9 1.1 2.1 .8 25.1 .06 .80
471-480 G Min Sco Reb Ast Stl TO Blk T po% p/r
Mario Chalmers 678 28 13.0 3.5 5.1 1.9 2.4 .2 21.9 .15 .97
Craig Ehlo 939 24 12.0 5.2 3.9 1.6 2.0 .4 21.7 .08 .94
Rich Kelley 856 22 10.8 9.8 3.6 1.3 3.5 1.4 23.1 .04 .89
Ben Gordon 771 28 20.5 3.4 3.0 .9 2.7 .2 24.7 .04 .97
Kelly Tripucka 730 30 18.8 4.5 3.2 1.1 2.9 .2 24.6 .03 .88
Aaron McKie 867 25 11.2 4.8 4.0 1.6 1.9 .3 20.6 .10 1.13
Brian Shaw 1068 23 9.5 5.0 5.8 1.1 2.5 .4 20.0 .10 .93
Wally Szczerbiak 705 30 18.1 5.0 2.7 .7 1.8 .3 24.9 .07 .78
Jarrett Jack 748 29 15.1 3.9 5.1 1.0 2.6 .2 23.0 .03 1.11
Jason Williams 732 31 13.0 2.9 7.2 1.5 2.6 .1 23.4 .07 .84
481-490 G Min Sco Reb Ast Stl TO Blk T po% p/r
Vernon Maxwell 903 29 15.0 3.3 4.1 1.4 2.4 .2 21.9 .06 .93
Jay Humphries 827 29 12.6 3.2 6.2 1.7 2.3 .1 22.6 .04 .99
Walter Dukes 585 27 12.2 10.8 1.4 .8 2.0 1.7 24.2 .07 1.05
Campy Russell 583 30 17.9 5.6 3.4 1.3 3.2 .3 24.8 .03 1.01
John Salley 882 22 10.8 7.0 1.7 .9 1.8 2.0 20.4 .14 1.04
Spud Webb 849 25 13.0 3.0 7.0 1.4 2.7 .2 22.9 .03 1.12
Sedale Threatt 1013 24 13.4 2.7 5.3 1.7 1.9 .2 22.2 .06 .98
Leroy Ellis 1108 26 11.1 8.7 1.6 .9 1.8 1.0 21.3 .05 .88
Satch Sanders 1041 24 12.2 6.5 1.5 .8 1.7 .9 19.6 .12 .94
Muggsy Bogues 905 29 8.9 3.3 8.9 1.9 2.0 .1 23.4 .02 .86
491-500 G Min Sco Reb Ast Stl TO Blk T po% p/r
Alton Lister 1028 20 10.3 10.4 1.4 .6 2.5 2.5 22.2 .09 .99
Tony Allen 838 22 14.0 5.9 2.1 2.3 2.2 .7 22.8 .12 .87
Antoine Carr 1094 20 15.0 5.8 1.8 .6 1.9 1.7 22.6 .08 .91
Anderson Varejao 701 24 11.2 11.3 1.5 1.3 1.4 .9 24.7 .10 .85
Brandon Jennings 471 32 17.9 3.6 5.9 1.5 2.6 .2 27.5 .03 .91
Wayman Tisdale 862 28 17.8 7.6 1.5 .7 2.1 .7 25.4 .02 .70
Walt Hazzard 784 27 14.3 3.1 5.9 1.3 2.3 .3 23.3 .08 .92
Lionel Hollins 748 28 13.4 3.0 5.3 2.0 3.2 .3 21.3 .11 1.00
Antonio Daniels 948 23 12.5 3.0 4.9 1.0 1.6 .1 20.9 .08 1.12
EddieF Johnson 637 29 17.0 2.7 5.9 1.3 3.1 .2 24.4 .05 1.03
-
- Posts: 416
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 7:04 pm
Re: NBA-ABA careers ranked, 1952-2016
If bchaikin assembled a greatest of all-time team, that team couldn't be champions any year in the NBA history.
I bet his team would be like this.
1. Magic Johnson
2. Reggie Miller
3. Adrian Dantley
4. Charles Barkley
5. Artis Gilmore.
But I'm being generous. I fear there's a strong chance he includes the likes of Cedric Maxwell, Deandre Jordan, Tyson Chandler etc.
I bet his team would be like this.
1. Magic Johnson
2. Reggie Miller
3. Adrian Dantley
4. Charles Barkley
5. Artis Gilmore.
But I'm being generous. I fear there's a strong chance he includes the likes of Cedric Maxwell, Deandre Jordan, Tyson Chandler etc.
Re: NBA-ABA careers ranked, 1952-2016
It would be nice if someone else would make a comprehensive ranking that they could explain, or at least make the effort to explain.
There's no "right" way to do it; and even if there were, you'd have old-timers complaining the new guys are overrated, and youngsters complaining the old-timers are overrated.
When you have equal complainers on both ends, you can rest.
May as well push on. Ranks in the 500 to 600 range:Still seeing the occasional all-star.
The PO/RS greater than 1.0 are getting scarcer; about like the distribution of prime numbers?
There's no "right" way to do it; and even if there were, you'd have old-timers complaining the new guys are overrated, and youngsters complaining the old-timers are overrated.
When you have equal complainers on both ends, you can rest.
May as well push on. Ranks in the 500 to 600 range:
Code: Select all
501-510 G Min Sco Reb Ast Stl TO Blk T po% p/r
Eric Snow 939 27 9.3 3.6 6.9 1.5 2.2 .2 20.5 .10 .97
Cuttino Mobley 773 37 16.9 4.2 2.8 1.2 2.1 .4 23.4 .03 .77
Paul Seymour 526 31 14.0 3.2 5.0 1.8 2.1 .2 23.2 .10 .98
Billy Owens 611 30 13.5 8.3 3.4 1.1 2.6 .6 24.1 .02 1.04
Rafer Alston 722 29 12.9 3.7 5.8 1.5 2.2 .2 22.9 .07 .93
Tyrone Hill 875 28 12.4 11.3 1.0 .9 1.9 .6 23.4 .08 .76
Tyreke Evans 437 33 17.8 5.6 5.2 1.5 3.0 .4 28.0 .01 .74
Matt Barnes 937 24 12.4 7.0 2.4 1.2 1.9 .7 21.7 .09 .89
Amir Johnson 682 23 13.4 9.8 1.8 1.0 1.8 1.7 25.5 .03 1.03
Dell Curry 1130 22 17.1 3.8 2.6 1.4 1.8 .3 23.5 .04 .80
511-520 G Min Sco Reb Ast Stl TO Blk T po% p/r
Slater Martin 682 36 11.8 2.8 4.8 1.8 1.8 .1 20.1 .12 .94
Dick VanArsdale 955 34 15.8 3.6 3.3 1.1 1.9 .2 22.1 .03 .74
Bobby Jackson 813 22 14.7 4.9 3.9 1.4 2.0 .1 23.3 .07 .93
Ken Norman 659 29 15.1 7.5 2.4 1.0 2.2 .8 24.5 .02 .98
Zaza Pachulia 942 21 12.0 10.3 1.9 1.2 2.3 .6 23.0 .05 .87
Ray Felix 675 24 15.9 9.6 1.0 .6 2.2 1.5 25.5 .05 .80
Emeka Okafor 596 32 14.7 12.3 .9 .8 1.9 1.9 28.5 .01 .54
Kevin Porter 692 29 13.4 2.0 9.3 1.6 4.0 .1 23.5 .05 .91
Matt Harpring 719 26 16.3 7.6 1.9 1.0 2.0 .2 24.3 .06 .84
Spencer Hawes 661 23 13.7 9.4 2.6 .6 2.3 1.5 25.2 .04 .96
521-530 G Min Sco Reb Ast Stl TO Blk T po% p/r
Isaiah Rider 584 32 19.2 4.6 3.2 .8 2.9 .3 24.6 .04 .96
James Donaldson 999 28 10.9 10.1 .9 .5 1.9 1.6 21.9 .05 1.01
Larry Jones 581 35 15.5 4.0 3.6 1.5 2.0 .3 23.2 .06 1.01
James Posey 929 27 11.8 6.5 2.1 1.4 1.5 .4 20.7 .07 .97
Jamaal Tinsley 473 29 12.1 4.3 8.3 2.0 3.4 .4 25.0 .07 .93
Kurt Rambis 1014 19 8.6 9.8 1.6 1.4 2.0 .9 20.0 .14 .98
Bill Bradley 837 31 13.9 3.3 3.8 .8 1.9 .2 20.1 .12 .93
Willie Anderson 596 29 14.5 4.7 4.5 1.3 2.6 .7 23.6 .06 .94
Rick Mahorn 1218 23 9.9 9.3 1.4 .8 1.9 1.3 20.2 .08 .89
Lou Williams 651 26 19.0 3.2 3.7 1.3 2.1 .3 25.9 .06 .82
531-540 G Min Sco Reb Ast Stl TO Blk T po% p/r
Kyle Korver 1055 27 14.4 4.3 2.3 .9 1.4 .5 21.0 .09 .87
Ricky Sobers 850 28 15.3 3.2 5.1 1.6 3.7 .3 21.7 .04 .96
Nazr Mohammed 1086 16 13.0 10.6 .8 .9 1.9 1.3 24.0 .07 .90
Leandro Barbosa 902 22 17.1 3.2 3.0 1.2 1.9 .2 22.8 .11 .84
LaPhonso Ellis 639 28 14.6 8.3 2.0 .9 2.0 1.0 24.3 .03 1.00
LaSalle Thompson 1004 22 11.0 10.7 1.6 1.2 2.6 1.5 22.8 .03 .87
BJ Armstrong 850 24 14.3 2.6 4.5 1.0 1.6 .1 21.7 .12 .91
Sherman Douglas 782 28 13.4 2.9 7.4 1.3 2.9 .1 23.3 .02 .94
Curtis Perry 532 29 11.4 10.1 2.3 1.3 2.4 1.0 23.4 .10 .91
Jay Vincent 611 27 17.4 7.2 2.2 .9 2.5 .4 24.8 .06 .83
541-550 G Min Sco Reb Ast Stl TO Blk T po% p/r
Neal Walk 576 24 15.9 9.6 2.8 .9 2.4 .7 27.0 .01 .79
Rodney Stuckey 640 28 16.9 4.1 4.2 1.2 2.4 .2 24.4 .04 .92
Don Kojis 823 24 15.5 6.5 1.9 1.3 2.0 .2 23.0 .02 1.21
Dan Schayes 1204 19 12.0 8.2 1.7 .8 2.3 1.2 20.7 .06 .96
Red Robbins 653 32 11.3 8.7 1.7 .7 1.9 .7 20.9 .10 1.02
Jim Paxson 836 27 17.1 2.7 3.4 1.5 1.9 .1 23.4 .05 .88
Charlie Ward 702 22 10.3 4.2 6.6 1.9 2.4 .3 22.1 .10 1.01
Andy Phillip 524 32 10.5 4.0 6.5 2.1 2.1 .4 23.0 .08 .87
Don Ohl 774 31 15.8 2.6 3.3 1.4 1.9 .0 21.4 .06 1.08
Kendrick Perkins 924 22 9.7 10.3 1.6 .6 2.6 1.9 20.9 .16 .87
551-560 G Min Sco Reb Ast Stl TO Blk T po% p/r
Loy Vaught 702 24 13.8 10.3 1.3 1.1 1.7 .5 24.7 .02 1.07
Kenny Carr 707 26 14.3 10.1 1.7 1.0 2.8 .6 23.5 .05 .88
Brandon Bass 764 23 15.1 7.8 1.3 .6 1.5 1.0 24.0 .08 .92
Channing Frye 764 24 14.1 7.8 1.4 .8 1.4 1.0 23.4 .04 .97
Kenny Sears 531 28 17.4 7.2 1.9 1.0 2.2 1.1 26.0 .00 .92
George Johnson 961 20 7.0 9.9 1.6 .9 2.5 3.8 21.1 .05 1.12
Derrick Favors 433 26 17.0 10.6 1.5 1.1 2.1 1.8 29.8 .01 .89
Johnny Davis 793 28 14.8 2.4 5.2 1.1 2.5 .2 21.8 .05 .99
Fred Carter 637 30 16.0 4.0 4.0 1.3 2.1 .2 23.6 .05 .91
Ricky Davis 747 30 16.5 4.4 3.8 1.2 2.6 .3 23.6 .02 .77
561-570 G Min Sco Reb Ast Stl TO Blk T po% p/r
Dave Corzine 949 23 11.3 8.6 2.2 .6 2.2 1.4 21.8 .06 .86
Marvin Webster 678 22 10.2 10.4 1.8 .5 2.5 2.2 22.6 .10 1.05
Darren Collison 524 29 16.0 3.3 5.8 1.4 2.6 .2 24.9 .04 .99
Doug Collins 447 34 18.9 3.3 3.4 1.3 3.1 .3 23.7 .08 1.08
Donnie Freeman 708 32 16.0 3.0 3.5 1.0 2.2 .3 21.5 .09 .89
Wayne Cooper 1052 20 10.9 9.7 1.2 .5 1.9 2.5 22.5 .06 .90
Mark Olberding 1000 25 11.6 7.0 3.0 .9 2.6 .4 19.6 .06 .98
Mark Eaton 949 29 6.7 9.6 1.1 .5 1.8 4.2 21.1 .08 .93
Reggie Williams 623 27 14.8 5.2 3.2 1.7 2.3 .9 23.7 .03 .98
Shane Battier 1089 30 10.9 5.1 2.1 1.2 1.1 1.0 19.8 .09 .72
571-580 G Min Sco Reb Ast Stl TO Blk T po% p/r
Derek Anderson 639 29 15.7 4.3 4.4 1.4 2.1 .2 24.2 .03 .74
Kenny Thomas 655 27 12.3 9.5 2.1 1.1 2.2 .6 22.9 .04 1.00
Corl. Williamson 886 22 17.0 5.8 1.8 .8 2.3 .5 22.7 .05 .90
Olden Polynice 1093 23 11.0 10.2 1.0 .7 1.6 .9 21.6 .03 1.00
Tree Rollins 1236 21 8.4 9.3 .9 .7 1.5 3.5 21.8 .06 .84
Bobby Smith 881 26 15.3 5.1 2.6 1.0 1.5 .4 23.0 .02 .92
Mario Elie 845 26 12.3 3.8 3.4 1.2 1.7 .2 19.5 .14 .97
Darnell Hillman 772 26 11.0 8.5 1.7 1.1 2.8 1.7 20.5 .11 .90
Nate Robinson 650 22 17.3 3.8 4.1 1.4 2.2 .1 24.5 .04 1.03
Bob Netolicky 680 34 13.3 7.3 1.3 .4 1.8 .6 20.6 .10 .96
581-590 G Min Sco Reb Ast Stl TO Blk T po% p/r
Darrall Imhoff 854 22 9.3 8.9 2.4 1.2 1.8 1.4 21.3 .07 1.03
Keith Erickson 853 25 11.8 5.2 3.4 1.2 1.8 .3 20.0 .11 .97
Shawn Bradley 873 23 11.0 9.2 1.0 .9 1.9 3.7 24.5 .03 .74
Terry Tyler 888 25 12.2 7.2 1.5 1.3 1.8 2.1 23.0 .01 .96
Wil Jones 754 30 11.3 7.4 2.3 1.3 2.6 .9 20.2 .04 .98
Darrell Walker 745 26 10.4 6.0 5.7 2.0 2.7 .4 22.7 .03 .74
Lionel Simmons 458 30 14.2 7.7 3.9 1.4 2.6 1.0 25.9 .01 1.06
Steve Hawes 739 23 11.5 9.1 2.7 1.1 2.2 .6 22.4 .04 .98
Troy Murphy 733 27 14.1 10.3 1.7 .9 1.6 .5 25.6 .00 .93
Brendan Haywood 847 23 11.1 9.7 .8 .6 1.6 2.1 22.5 .11 .84
591-600 G Min Sco Reb Ast Stl TO Blk T po% p/r
Brian Taylor 638 32 13.4 2.8 4.3 2.3 2.2 .3 21.8 .07 .86
Luke Ridnour 852 26 12.9 3.3 5.7 1.4 2.3 .3 22.1 .02 .92
Mike Gale 906 25 8.8 3.6 4.8 2.4 2.5 .7 18.8 .08 1.09
Chris Gatling 713 20 17.1 9.0 1.1 1.1 2.5 .9 25.6 .02 .98
Raef LaFrentz 597 26 13.8 8.4 1.4 .7 1.2 2.3 25.6 .06 .78
Dee Brown 636 28 13.6 3.4 4.5 1.6 1.9 .4 22.7 .04 1.05
Kevin Loughery 792 30 15.5 2.7 4.1 1.6 2.0 .1 22.1 .05 .90
Marvin Williams 834 29 13.6 7.0 1.5 1.0 1.3 .6 22.3 .05 .78
Walt Williams 742 26 15.4 5.3 3.0 1.2 2.4 .8 23.1 .03 .80
Jim Fox 770 23 12.6 9.4 2.2 .8 2.0 .4 22.9 .03 .90
The PO/RS greater than 1.0 are getting scarcer; about like the distribution of prime numbers?